San Francisco rent

Yes, I have been busy on the blog today...

SF to try to introduce 3 new rent laws.
Chris Daly is a super f**k head.

He has always been a super f**k head.

When will there be enough rent laws in SF?
What happened to "free economy"?
If you cannot afford to live in a $1,000/mth rent home, then move the hell out to one that you can afford. How on earth does it make sense for the city of SF to keep governing what a private property owner can or cannot do with their home??
Listen up Chris Daly... if I wanted to rent my one bedroom home out for $5,000 in the Bay View district, do you think I would get a tenant? Rent is driven by the laws of demand and supply too.

The example given in the Chronicle article above just does not make sense. The person living in the Western Addition is earning $800/mth. Her rent is $1,000/mth. Errrr, do the f**king math idiot. If your stupid new law goes into effect, the landlord can only charge her ONE THIRD OF $1,000... $333.33. Where, in the bay area, can you find rent for $333.33 for a one bedroom home (assumption, since the article did not state the size)???? And then the landlord cannot evict this person because of the previous laws put in place by the same f**k head about the removal of seniors. Doesn't the city of SF then control a private individual's PRIVATE real estate? Is this what America has become? This person who draws a monthly income of $800, shouldn't even be living by herself in a place where rent is $1,000. She should go get a room mate or something. I don't know. It's not my f**king problem... it's not my f**king business... it's plain economic sense.

When I first rented after graduating from college. I did not move into a place BY MYSELF for $1,000. I lived in a house with 3 other room mates for $1,200. We each paid $300. Why do you have to have laws to teach common sense? The problem is not with the economics of the situation. The problem is with the f**k heads like Chris Daly who keep trying to manipulate the situation as if it is one that the city should be controlling. It is not. A $60 increase in rent for a place that rents for $1,000 DOES NOT even keep up with inflation. Just imagine that that was your salary increase... you would be screaming bloody murder. This is income to some other soul too. Yes, he/she may be swimming in wealth, but he/she damn well earned it... and has the right to do it.

Chris Daly... instead of trying to do things like that, maybe you should spend your time going after places like ParkMerced who constantly cheat and deceive their renters. Or are they too big for you to deal with? Coward!!
Who on earth keeps voting this f**k head in anyway?